Potts And Naeth Win Ironman 70.3 St. Croix,Lance Armstrong Third

‪Norsk (bokmål)‬: Lance Armstrong under Tour...

‪Norsk (bokmål)‬: Lance Armstrong under Tour de France 2005. English: Lance Armstrong at the 2005 Tour de France. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

American Andy Potts and Canadian Angela Naeth took the wins at today’s rainy Ironman 70.3 St. Croix event. American Lance Armstrong finished on the podium to earn valuable points towards his goal of qualifying for the Ironman World Championship.

Men’s Race

Potts led the men out of the water, with Stéphane Poulat following close behind. Armstrong came into T1 with a group about 80 seconds down of the pair. Armstrong quickly went to work on the bike.  At mile 21 of the ride came the famed hill known as “the beast”, which is a 7/10-mile stretch made up of a 600-foot climb with an average grade of 14 percent and a maximum grade of 21 percent. Poulat crested the hill first, but Armstrong was only 12 seconds back. By mile 45, Armstrong had found his way to the front and had built a minute lead over Poulat and Potts.

At the end of the 56-mile ride Armstrong owned a gap of 1:45 over the pair. The podium was pretty well decided at the start of the run. Behind Poulat and Potts the next fastest chaser was New Zealand’s Terenzo Bozzone at just over five minutes back. At the front of the race, the seven-time Tour de France champion held his lead through the first three miles of the half marathon, but he couldn’t keep the fast-running former Olympians away. Eventually Potts and Poulat started chipping away at Armstrong, with Potts taking over the lead at mile 8. Poulat passed Armstrong a couple of miles later and that’s how the top-three would finish.

Potts ran a 1:12:50 half marathon to take the 4:03:31 win, his second 70.3 victory of the season. Poulat finished second in 4:05:25. Armstrong earned a podium spot with a finish time of 4:07:08. The trip to St. Croix was well worth Armstrong’s efforts as he secured 585 points towards his Kona Pro Ranking. According to his previously-announced schedule, Armstrong will next head back to the mainland for May 20’s Ironman 70.3 Florida event.

Women’s Race

The women’s race kicked off with Germany’s Nina Kraft and the United States’ Mary Beth Ellis building a commanding lead out of the 1.2-mile swim. The pair headed into T1 in just over 27 minutes. A group containing the rest of the contenders, including Canada’s Angela Naeth, exited the water at around 29:45. The gap was no problem for the fast-riding Naeth. She found her way to Ellis by mile 37. Despite suffering a flat tire in the final mile of the bike, Naeth managed to make it to T2 with a nearly two-minute lead over Ellis.

Behind the fast-riding pair, the rest of the field struggled to keep pace. Kraft was the third women into T2, but she sat 10 minutes back of Ellis and 12 minutes back of Naeth. Naeth outpaced Ellis on the run with a 1:18:48 half marathon, easily giving her the win in 4:28:12. Ellis finished second at 4:33:34.

Ironman 70.3 St. Croix
St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands – May 6, 2012
1.2-mile swim, 56-mile bike, 13.1-mile run

Men
1. Andy Potts (USA) 4:03:31
2. Stéphane Poulat (FRA) 4:05:25
3. Lance Armstrong (USA) 4:07:08
4. Alessandro Degasperi (ITA) 4:08:53
5. Terenzo Bozzone (NZL) 4:10:04

Women
1. Angela Naeth (CAN) 4:28:12
2. Mary Beth Ellis (USA) 4:33:34

From Triathlete Europe

Triathlon program 16.4.2012 – 22.4.2012

Monday:

A) 50 minutes run, Zone2,3  B)45 minute swim, Zone 2,3

Tuesday:

6:30 English school 20 min. run warm up, 10 x 100, 3 x 1000 3:40 (Zone 4)

Wednesday: A) 6:30 Agrotis parking, 15 easy cycling to Logos radio station, 3 x 2 laps(2 km each)  Time trial, Zone 4

B) 40 min. Swim Zone 2,3

Thursday:

50 min easy run, Zone 2,3

Friday:

A)40 min run with 5X200 race pace

B) 30 min swim continues zone 3

Saturday:

Off

Sunday:

Sprint Triathlon Race. Good luck to all of us.

 

Triathlon Training program 9-15.4.2012

Monday: 45 swim with wet suit at the sea

Tuesday: I) 50 min easy run   2) 1 hour easy cycling

Wednesday: 6 o’clock from Agrotis parking. 5 laps spinning with 200 sprint, 5 laps time trial + 10 min run race pace, 10 easy run

2) 45 swim

Thursday: 50 min easy run

Friday:

1) 1:30 easy cycling

2) 45 swim
Saturday: 5:15 from Agrotis parking to the mountains. 15 warm up and 4X1000 uphill with slow downhill.

Sunday: rest

 

 

Olympic Games won’t be the same anymore.

China vs. Austria in Olympic Beach Volleyball....

China vs. Austria in Olympic Beach Volleyball. The Austrian team are sisters. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This morning has been a sad morning for me. Even though it started so well, with our successful  training session, the news i read later at Yahoo sports  have ruined my day.  I saw an article called :

Women beach volleyball players don’t have to wear bikinis at Olympics

Why are you doing this to us? Women beach volley is a highlighted event, especially for men fans. Sitting at my couch, drinking a beer and watching beautiful girls with perfect bodies wearing bikinis and rolling in the sand was something i was waiting for during every Olympic Games. Hopefully the players won’t follow this instruction, otherwise will be the end of an era. Here is the article:

Women beach volleyball players won’t have to wear bikinis at the 2012 London Olympics. A new rule announced Tuesday says that participants in this summer’s beach volleyball competition can wear shorts and sleeved tops.

Athletes in the event have exclusively worn bikinis since the sport was introduced at the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta. Competitors could also wear bodysuits in cold-weather events.

The change was made to reflect cultural conventions of various participating countries.

“Shorts of a maximum length of [1.18 inches] above the knee, and sleeved or sleeveless tops,” will now be allowed, according to the new IOC ruling.

Since the Beijing Olympics, most beach volleyball competitions have changed rules to allow for more modest uniforms. It’s an attempt to broaden the diversity in the sport, which tends to be dominated by athletes from Europe, Brazil and the United States. Allowing shorts and shirts can encourage participation from countries with more modest cultural beliefs.

As the AP reports, the field at London’s beach volleyball competition won’t be dictated by world rankings, as in Olympics past. Qualifying tournaments on various continents will fill the 24-team draw.

Heart Surgeon Speaks Out On What Really Causes Heart Disease

While we savor the tantalizing taste of a sweet roll, our bodies respond alarmingly as if a foreign invader arrived declaring war. Foods loaded with sugars and simple carbohydrates, or processed with omega-6 oils for long shelf life have been the mainstay of the American diet for six decades. These foods have been slowly poisoning everyone.

How does eating a simple sweet roll create a cascade of inflammation to make you sick?

Here is an interview from a top Heart surgeon, talking about it:

We physicians with all our training, knowledge and authority often acquire a rather large ego that tends to make it difficult to admit we are wrong. So, here it is. I freely admit to being wrong. As a heart surgeon with 25 years experience, having performed over 5,000 open-heart surgeries, today is my day to right the wrong with medical and scientific fact.

I trained for many years with other prominent physicians labelled “opinion makers.” Bombarded with scientific literature, continually attending education seminars, we opinion makers insisted heart disease resulted from the simple fact of elevated blood cholesterol.

The only accepted therapy was prescribing medications to lower cholesterol and a diet that severely restricted fat intake. The latter of course we insisted would lower cholesterol and heart disease. Deviations from these recommendations were considered heresy and could quite possibly result in malpractice.

It Is Not Working!

These recommendations are no longer scientifically or morally defensible. The discovery a few years ago that inflammation in the artery wall is the real cause of heart disease is slowly leading to a paradigm shift in how heart disease and other chronic ailments will be treated.

The long-established dietary recommendations have created epidemics of obesity and diabetes, the consequences of which dwarf any historical plague in terms of mortality, human suffering and dire economic consequences.

Despite the fact that 25% of the population takes expensive statin medications and despite the fact we have reduced the fat content of our diets, more Americans will die this year of heart disease than ever before.

Statistics from the American Heart Association show that 75 million Americans currently suffer from heart disease, 20 million have diabetes and 57 million have pre-diabetes. These disorders are affecting younger and younger people in greater numbers every year.

Simply stated, without inflammation being present in the body, there is no way that cholesterol would accumulate in the wall of the blood vessel and cause heart disease and strokes. Without inflammation, cholesterol would move freely throughout the body as nature intended. It is inflammation that causes cholesterol to become trapped.

Inflammation is not complicated — it is quite simply your body’s natural defence to a foreign invader such as a bacteria, toxin or virus. The cycle of inflammation is perfect in how it protects your body from these bacterial and viral invaders. However, if we chronically expose the body to injury by toxins or foods the human body was never designed to process,a condition occurs called chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is just as harmful as acute inflammation is beneficial.

What thoughtful person would willfully expose himself repeatedly to foods or other substances that are known to cause injury to the body? Well, smokers perhaps, but at least they made that choice willfully.

The rest of us have simply followed the recommended mainstream diet that is low in fat and high in polyunsaturated fats and carbohydrates, not knowing we were causing repeated injury to our blood vessels. This repeated injury creates chronic inflammation leading to heart disease, stroke, diabetes and obesity.

Let me repeat that: The injury and inflammation in our blood vessels is caused by the low fat diet recommended for years by mainstream medicine.

What are the biggest culprits of chronic inflammation? Quite simply, they are the overload of simple, highly processed carbohydrates (sugar, flour and all the products made from them) and the excess consumption of omega-6 vegetable oils like soybean, corn and sunflower that are found in many processed foods.

Take a moment to visualize rubbing a stiff brush repeatedly over soft skin until it becomes quite red and nearly bleeding. you kept this up several times a day, every day for five years. If you could tolerate this painful brushing, you would have a bleeding, swollen infected area that became worse with each repeated injury. This is a good way to visualize the inflammatory process that could be going on in your body right now.

Regardless of where the inflammatory process occurs, externally or internally, it is the same. I have peered inside thousands upon thousands of arteries. A diseased artery looks as if someone took a brush and scrubbed repeatedly against its wall. Several times a day, every day, the foods we eat create small injuries compounding into more injuries, causing the body to respond continuously and appropriately with inflammation.

While we savor the tantalizing taste of a sweet roll, our bodies respond alarmingly as if a foreign invader arrived declaring war. Foods loaded with sugars and simple carbohydrates, or processed with omega-6 oils for long shelf life have been the mainstay of the American diet for six decades. These foods have been slowly poisoning everyone.

How does eating a simple sweet roll create a cascade of inflammation to make you sick?

Imagine spilling syrup on your keyboard and you have a visual of what occurs inside the cell. When we consume simple carbohydrates such as sugar, blood sugar rises rapidly. In response, your pancreas secretes insulin whose primary purpose is to drive sugar into each cell where it is stored for energy. If the cell is full and does not need glucose, it is rejected to avoid extra sugar gumming up the works.

When your full cells reject the extra glucose, blood sugar rises producing more insulin and the glucose converts to stored fat.

What does all this have to do with inflammation? Blood sugar is controlled in a very narrow range. Extra sugar molecules attach to a variety of proteins that in turn injure the blood vessel wall. This repeated injury to the blood vessel wall sets off inflammation. When you spike your blood sugar level several times a day, every day, it is exactly like taking sandpaper to the inside of your delicate blood vessels.

While you may not be able to see it, rest assured it is there. I saw it in over 5,000 surgical patients spanning 25 years who all shared one common denominator — inflammation in their arteries.

Let’s get back to the sweet roll. That innocent looking goody not only contains sugars, it is baked in one of many omega-6 oils such as soybean. Chips and fries are soaked in soybean oil; processed foods are manufactured with omega-6 oils for longer shelf life. While omega-6′s are essential -they are part of every cell membrane controlling what goes in and out of the cell — they must be in the correct balance with omega-3′s.

If the balance shifts by consuming excessive omega-6, the cell membrane produces chemicals called cytokines that directly cause inflammation.

Today’s mainstream American diet has produced an extreme imbalance of these two fats. The ratio of imbalance ranges from 15:1 to as high as 30:1 in favor of omega-6. That’s a tremendous amount of cytokines causing inflammation. In today’s food environment, a 3:1 ratio would be optimal and healthy.

To make matters worse, the excess weight you are carrying from eating these foods creates overloaded fat cells that pour out large quantities of pro-inflammatory chemicals that add to the injury caused by having high blood sugar. The process that began with a sweet roll turns into a vicious cycle over time that creates heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes and finally, Alzheimer’s disease, as the inflammatory process continues unabated.

There is no escaping the fact that the more we consume prepared and processed foods, the more we trip the inflammation switch little by little each day. The human body cannot process, nor was it designed to consume, foods packed with sugars and soaked in omega-6 oils.

There is but one answer to quieting inflammation, and that is returning to foods closer to their natural state. To build muscle, eat more protein. Choose carbohydrates that are very complex such as colorful fruits and vegetables. Cut down on or eliminate inflammation- causing omega-6 fats like corn and soybean oil and the processed foods that are made from them.

One tablespoon of corn oil contains 7,280 mg of omega-6; soybean contains 6,940 mg. Instead, use olive oil or butter from grass-fed beef.

Animal fats contain less than 20% omega-6 and are much less likely to cause inflammation than the supposedly healthy oils labelled polyunsaturated. Forget the “science” that has been drummed into your head for decades. The science that saturated fat alone causes heart disease is non-existent. The science that saturated fat raises blood cholesterol is also very weak. Since we now know that cholesterol is not the cause of heart disease, the concern about saturated fat is even more absurd today.

The cholesterol theory led to the no-fat, low-fat recommendations that in turn created the very foods now causing an epidemic of inflammation. Mainstream medicine made a terrible mistake when it advised people to avoid saturated fat in favor of foods high in omega-6 fats. We now have an epidemic of arterial inflammation leading to heart disease and other silent killers.

What you can do is choose whole foods your grandmother served and not those your mom turned to as grocery store aisles filled with manufactured foods. By eliminating inflammatory foods and adding essential nutrients from fresh unprocessed food, you will reverse years of damage in your arteries and throughout your body from consuming the typical American diet.

Navy SEAL Fitness Test Breakdown

Swim 500 Yards

Maximum time allowed is 12 minutes, 30 seconds — but to be competitive, you should swim the distance in at least 8 to 9 minutes, utilizing only the Combat Swimmer Stroke, sidestroke, or breast stroke.

Push-ups

Minimum number is 42 in 2 minutes, but you should shoot for at least 100 for an average score. Do not pace yourself. Push as many push-ups out as fast as you can, but do not neglect proper form or the SEAL instructor will not count them. (Rest 2 minutes, then move on to the next exercise.)

Sit-ups

Minimum number is 52 in 2 minutes, but you should strive for at least 100 in 2 minutes for an average score. PACE yourself! (Rest 2 minutes.)

Pull-ups

The minimum is eight pull-ups with no time limit, but you cannot touch the ground or let go of the bar. You should be able to do 15 to 20 to be competitive.  (Rest 10 minutes).

1.5-mile run

Wearing boots and pants, the maximum time allowed for this one is 11 minutes, 30 seconds, but you should be able to cover the distance in 9 to 10 minutes to be competitive. Pace yourself: do not start off too fast on the first lap.

Cycling Pros Racing Ironman

By Kevin Mackinnon

Last week’s announcement of the new partnership between the LiveStrong Foundation and Ironman, coupled with the fact that Lance Armstrong will be racing at a number of Ironman events this year as he tries to qualify for the Ironman World Championship has generated lots of excitement in the triathlon world. Armstrong is certainly the most well-known cyclist to take on a swim/ bike/ run event, but he’s hardly the first – there have been some impressive cycling stars who have some impressive Ironman results. Here’s a history of a few who have taken on the challenge:

Karin Thuerig 

The Swiss Olympian was a two-time Olympic bronze medalist in the individual time trial and a gold medalist in the same discipline at the world championships. She won Ironman titles in France, Switzerland and Lanzarote, and finished third at the Ironman 70.3 World Championship last year. She was a many-time podium finisher in Kona, including a pair of fifth place finishes at the big show.

John Howard:

In his heyday on the bike (not that he still isn’t!) Howard was the face of American cycling. He was a gold medalist at the 1971 Pan American Games and represented the United States at the 1968, 1972 and 1976 Olympics. In 1980 he made his Ironman debut in Kona and finished third. A year later he returned to take the title, proving that a cycling specialist truly could win the Ironman.

Steve Larsen

Like Lance Armstrong was at one point, Larsen was a member of the famous Motorola Cycling Team and turnd to triathlon whe he just missed making the US Mountain Bike Team. In 2001 he won Ironman Lake Placid, breaking former Ironman World Champion Thomas Hellriegel’s course record in the process. He would continue to compete over the Ironman distance for years. (Sadly, Larsen passed away few years ago – here’s a column that appeared on Ironman.com. )

Chann McRae

A childhood friend of Lance Armstrong, McRae raced for three different pro teams over in Europe, including US Postal (Armstrong’s team) in 2001 and 2002. He was the US Pro Cycling champion in 2002. McRae Finished as high as eighth at Ironman Canada one year during his short career as an Ironman athlete.

Kai Hundertmarck

The former Team Telekom member blazed into the triathlon world with an age group win in Kona in 2005, finishing as the first amateur (16th overall). He would continue to race as a pro for a few years after that impressive performance, racking up a number of top-five finishes at Ironman races around the world.

Laurent Jalabert

The many-time Tour de France stage winner never won his home country’s tour, but he did with the Tour of Spain in 1995. In his Kona debut in 2007 he passed over 1,000 riders on the bike, which he followed up with a 3:09 marathon – he finished in 9:19 and was 76th overall. In 2008 he finished 12th overall at Ironman France. Jalabert will be racing here in Panama this weekend. He won’t be going head to head with Armstrong, though – he’s racing in the 40-44 age group.

Foot Strike and Injury Rates in Endurance Runners

Read that very interesting study, published at PubMed, which concluded that runners who habitually rearfoot strike have significantly higher rates of repetitive stress injury than those who mostly forefoot strike.

Foot Strike and Injury Rates in Endurance Runners: a retrospective study.

Source

1Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge MA 02138, USA 2Department of Athletics, Harvard University, 65 North Harvard Street, Boston MA 02163, USA 3University Health Services, Harvard University, 75 Mt Auburn Street, Cambridge MA 02138, USA 4Baylor Health Care System, Institute of Health Care Research and Improvement, 8080 North Central Expressway, Suite 500, LB 81, Dallas, TX 75206, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

This retrospective study tests if runners who habitually forefoot strike have different rates of injury than runners who habitually rearfoot strike.

METHODS:

We measured the strike characteristics of middle and long distance runners from a collegiate cross country team and quantified their history of injury, including the incidence and rate of specific injuries, the severity of each injury, and the rate of mild, moderate and severe injuries per mile run.

RESULTS:

Of the 52 runners studied, 36 (59%) primarily used a rearfoot strike and 16 (31%) primarily used a forefoot strike. Approximately 74% of runners experienced a moderate or severe injury each year, but those who habitually rearfoot strike had approximately twice the rate of repetitive stress injuries than individuals who habitually forefoot strike. Traumatic injury rates were not significantly different between the two groups. A generalized linear model showed that strike type, sex, race distance, and average miles per week each correlate significantly (p<0.01) with repetitive injury rates.

CONCLUSIONS:

Competitive cross country runners on a college team incur high injury rates, but runners who habitually rearfoot strike have significantly higher rates of repetitive stress injury than those who mostly forefoot strike. This study does not test the causal bases for this general difference. One hypothesis, which requires further research, is that the absence of a marked impact peak in the ground reaction force during a forefoot strike compared to a rearfoot strike may contribute to lower rates of injuries in habitual forefoot strikers.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers